The Revenge of Han van Meegeren, One of the Great Art Forgers of All Time

The Revenge of Han van Meegeren, One of the Great Art Forgers of All Time


Han van Meegeren was born in 1889 and developed
an interest in painting at a young age. He wasn’t supported in his dream to become
an artist by his father, who forbade van Meegeren’s artistic development, trying to steer his
son in the direction of architecture instead. Undeterred, van Meegeren met Bartus Kortelling—a
teacher and painter—at his school, and Kortelling later became van Meegeren’s mentor. Kortelling loved paintings from the Dutch
Golden Age and likely had a hand in van Meegeren’s love of golden age paintings as well. A particular fan of Johannes Vermeer, Kortelling
showed his protégé how Vermeer mixed his colours—a lesson that would have a great
impact on the aspiring artist’s later life. Still, van Meegeren’s father was not impressed. He sent his son to school in Delft to become
an architect. Perhaps he wasn’t aware, but Delft was the
one-time hometown of Vermeer. Van Meegeren proved to be an adept architect,
but his heart was still set on painting. He continued his painting lessons and never
took the final exam that would allow him to become an architect. Instead, he moved on to art school in The
Hague in 1913. That same year, he was granted a Gold Medal
from his school in Delft for his painting The Study of the Interior of the Church of
Saint Lawrence. Van Meegeren exhibited his first set of legitimate
paintings in 1917, and they proved to be quite popular among critics. However, as time went on he garnered less
and less attention. Critics were more interested in the forward-thinking
artists like the Cubists and Surrealists; they remarked that van Meegeren had little
to offer because he was focused only on the past. He received comments about being unoriginal
and simply “a copycat” without as much talent as the great artists who had lived
before him. In 1945, van Meegeren declared, Driven into a state of anxiety and depression
due to the all-too-meager appreciation of my work, I decided, one fateful day, to revenge
myself on the art critics and experts by doing something the likes of which the world had
never seen before. That “something” happened to be “the
perfect forgery.” Van Meegeren set out to show the world that
he was just as good as the old artists by creating paintings and passing them off as
the old artists’ originals—and make a lot of money doing it. It was easy for him to settle on Vermeer. He already had a base knowledge of Vermeer
from his mentor, and Vermeer was a good target because he’d only produced around 35 paintings—just
a tenth of his contemporaries’ output. That meant art historians were constantly
on the lookout for undiscovered Vermeers. The thought that there should be more likely
made it easier for them to believe that they saw a new one when they were presented with
one—even if it was a forgery. Van Meegeren was a careful forger. He did extensive research on Vermeer and his
paintings, bought authentic 17th-century canvasses, and used the original formulas for making
his own paints. His biggest problem was trying to make the
painting look like it was 300 years old. Oil paint takes decades to dry completely,
which meant that a newer painting would be found out the moment someone touched it. He was forced to experiment with the original
paint formulas and baking his paintings in an oven. Most of the paints burned or melted, but he
found using phenol formaldehyde on a finished painting would make the paint harden. When it was finished baking, he would roll
a cylinder over it to make more cracks, making it look more legitimate. Once the process of creating old-looking paintings
was perfected, van Meegeren had another obstacle: the content of the paintings. At first, he painted pictures much like those
that Vermeer had painted, but he found that experts looked too closely at them and detected
little differences between the real thing and the forgery. He ended up taking a gamble and painting something
completely different than what Vermeer painted, but with hints of Vermeer’s style. The result? Millions of dollars straight into van Meegeren’s
pockets. It was his famous “Christ at Emmaus” painting
that allowed van Meegeren to break into the market. The painting was larger than anything Vermeer
had done, and it had religious subject matter, which was also different. But art historians had speculated that Vermeer
had painted something like “Christ at Emmaus” for some time, and they were eager to believe
that the painting really was Vermeer’s. He even fooled Abraham Bredius, an art historian
who had a reputation for authenticating new Vermeers. The historian wrote an article on “Christ
at Emmaus,” saying, It is a wonderful moment in the life of a
lover of art when he finds himself suddenly confronted with a hitherto unknown painting
by a great master, untouched, on the original canvas, and without any restoration, just
as it left the painter’s studio! And what a picture! … I am inclined to say the masterpiece of
Johannes Vermeer of Delft… Van Meegeren continued to churn out paintings
with religious subject matter, and they continued to be snapped up by art enthusiasts. By the time he was found out, he’d made
$30 million on his forgeries (about $400 million today). Unfortunately, his incredible success ended
up being his undoing. During World War II, Hermann Goerring—“the
No. 2 man in Nazi Germany”—traded 137 paintings for van Meegeren’s forgery “Christ
with the Woman Taken in Adultery.” Unfortunately for van Meegeren, Goerring kept
meticulous papers regarding his transactions. At the end of World War II, van Meegeren’s
name was found next to the trade for the Vermeer, and he was arrested in 1945 for “collaborating
with the enemy.” The allegations might have carried a death
sentence, and so van Meegeren was forced to out himself as a forger. He claimed responsibility for the painting
of the Vermeer that Goerring had bought, along with five other Vermeer paintings and two
Pieter de Hooghs, all of which had been “discovered” after 1937. The astonished court room had him paint another
forgery in front of them to prove it, and when he passed the test his charges were changed
to forgery and he was sentenced to just one year in prison, which was the minimum prison
sentence for such a crime. Rather than be angry with van Meegeren, the
Dutch public largely lauded him as a hero. During his trial, he presented himself as
a patriot—he had, after all, secured 137 paintings that had been unlawfully seized
by Goerring by duping the famous Nazi into thinking he’d purchased a real Vermeer. As van Meegeren said, “How could a person
demonstrate his patriotism, his love of Holland more than I did by conning the great enemy
of the Dutch people?” Van Meegeren never served his one year in
prison. He died of a heart attack two months after
his two-year trial. Until the end, he believed that—when he
was gone—his name would soon be forgotten, and his paintings would eventually be remembered
as true Vermeers.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *